2020 Poverty Guidelines Shed Light on Health Policy Debates

Home 9 Family Economic Security 9 2020 Poverty Guidelines Shed Light on Health Policy Debates

The new federal poverty guidelines, which are adjusted for inflation each January, provide an opportunity to reflect on the challenges faced by low-income working families, and they help illustrate why state and federal policymakers ought to help more Americans gain access to health care.  

These guidelines largely control who is eligible for low or no-cost health care. They show, for example, that single parents with one child are currently ineligible for BadgerCare if they have a full-time job that pays more than $8.29 per hour! This leaves behind many families struggling to make ends meet.

The 2020 federal poverty guidelines  issued a few weeks ago increased the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) by 1.6 to 2.0 percent for most family sizes. The adjustments for inflation slightly increase eligibility for many federal benefit programs, such as Medicaid, FoodShare and child care subsidies. An updated table on the Wisconsin Budget Project website shows what the poverty level is for different family sizes and how that affects eligibility for different public benefits. It also translates the annual poverty level figures into monthly and hourly incomes.

The positive thing about the new guidelines is that the modest inflation adjustment expands eligibility to include a small number of people who had a tiny bit too much income to qualify for benefits in December. But that’s only true if they didn’t get a raise this year greater than the small increase in the poverty guidelines. For a family of three, the poverty level is now $21,720, which is $390 more than last year, an adjustment of 1.8%.

Examining the table on the Wisconsin Budget Project website helps show why many low-income adults in Wisconsin are still uninsured – despite the substantial progress made in 2014 and 2015 in reducing our state’s uninsured population. It also helps illustrate why far more will become uninsured if the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is changed in ways that increase costs for low-wage workers.

Here are a few interesting and troublesome implications of how the 2020 poverty levels relate to BadgerCare eligibility:

  • For a single parent with one child, the BadgerCare income limit amounts to $8.29 per hour (assuming a 40-hour work week). In other words, an adult in a two-person family will be ineligible for BadgerCare if they make just $1.04 per hour more than the minimum wage.
  • For “single childless adults,” the BadgerCare income ceiling is $1,063 per month, which is equivalent to working slightly less than 34 hours per week at the minimum wage. If they have a full-time minimum wage job they will have to seek subsidized private coverage through the federal Marketplace, but the higher cost-sharing in those plans puts that out of reach for many low-income people.
  • In states that used the ACA to expand Medicaid eligibility for adults to 138% of FPL, as Governor Evers recommended, the income limit amounts to $8.47 per hour for a “childless adult” and $11.44 for a single parent with one child.

Our website has an infographic that contains the new federal poverty levels and shows how they relate to different categories of eligibility for BadgerCare and subsidized coverage in the federal health insurance Marketplace.

We believe that everyone has a right to see a doctor if they get sick and shouldn’t have to worry about going bankrupt because of a medical emergency. However, Wisconsin’s current income limits for BadgerCare exclude many families working hard just to get by. This burden falls disproportionately on Black, Native American, and Latinx Wisconsinites who are more likely to have jobs that pay near poverty level wages. Failing to meet the health care needs of working families continues to trap them in cycles of poverty and health disparities.

The ACA allowed states to make substantial progress in reducing racial disparities in insurance coverage and gave millions of people access to more affordable health care, but there is much left to do. In contrast, the Trump administration and Republican governors continue to challenge the legality of the ACA.  The newest case is destined to end up in the Supreme Court, and again threatens what progress we’ve made.

In the context of this political struggle, think about the financial challenges facing a single parent in Wisconsin who has one child and is making a little more than $8.29, but makes too much money to qualify for BadgerCare. Try to imagine how you would cover rent, utilities, food, clothing, transportation and other expenses for your family, and then pay health insurance premiums and deductibles on top of all those other household costs. There’s a lot of work to do, and we can’t afford to move backwards.

Jon Peacock and William Parke-Sutherland

Topics
Search

Enter your search term and select the types of content you’d like to see to search our entire Multimedia Library.

Sign up for Emails

Your address helps us identify your legislators and the most relevant messages to send you.