Analyzing Wisconsin’s “Robin Hood in Reverse” Budget

by | August 7, 2013

Home 9 Early Care and Education 9 Analyzing Wisconsin’s “Robin Hood in Reverse” Budget ( Page 12 )

One of the most disappointing things about Wisconsin’s 2013-15 budget bill is that it shifts state resources from low-income Wisconsinites to the those who are very well off.  As I said about a month ago in a long Q and A format interview in the Capital Times, the bill employs a “Robin Hood in reverse” strategy for allocating resources.

The Wisconsin Budget Project issued a two-page paper this week explaining the top ten reasons for concluding that the new budget shifts resources from the poor to the rich. If you would prefer a more condensed explanation, see yesterday’s Budget Project blog post.I think the clincher is that the budget builds up the General Fund balance – thereby paving the way for income tax cuts that primarily benefit the wealthy – by siphoning off money from the federal block grant known as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF).   The decision to divert those funds was based in part on an unrealistic assumption that Wisconsin Works (W-2) participation would decline sharply, even though it has actually been increasing. In fact, W-2 enrollment was 8% higher in June than the budget assumed.

The budget maneuvers that shift the federal TANF funds (so they can ease the way for tax cuts) are also justified by a $31 million cut in the Wisconsin Shares child care subsidy program. As a result of that cut, the state is squandering an opportunity to use the savings to make long overdue investments in the quality of early education.

Read more about those regressive choices and others in the Budget Project’s short paper or blog post

Jon Peacock

Kids Forward
Kids Forward

Join us to build a Wisconsin where every child and family thrives.

Recent

Our Take: The Wisconsin 2023-25 Biennial Budget

Our Take: The Wisconsin 2023-25 Biennial Budget

We appreciate Governor Evers being a stop gap for some of the most egregious proposals from the Republican-controlled Joint Finance Committee (JFC). But, if we want to actually address Wisconsin’s racial disparities, we have a lot more work to do.

Proposed Tax Cut Privileges Wealthiest 1%, Leaves Struggling Families Behind

Proposed Tax Cut Privileges Wealthiest 1%, Leaves Struggling Families Behind

Wisconsin can be a place where we all—regardless of race or place—have what we need to make ends meet. However, last week the Republican-controlled Joint Finance Committee voted for a tax cut that would aid in gutting supports for families. Letting Wisconsin’s wealthiest off the hook from paying what they owe means many struggling families are left behind, particularly children and families of color and those furthest from opportunity. We are calling on Governor Evers to stand up for everyday families and veto this tax cut for the wealthy few.

Sign up for Emails

Your address helps us identify your legislators and the most relevant messages to send you.