New Study Casts a Different Light on the Lament that Consumers Don’t Bear Enough of the Costs for Their Health Care

by Kids Forward | November 2, 2010

Home 9 Health Care 9 New Study Casts a Different Light on the Lament that Consumers Don’t Bear Enough of the Costs for Their Health Care

Is higher cost sharing an effective strategy for reducing health care spending? A new study published today in Health Affairs illustrates one of problems with the theory that increasing co-pays and deductibles will lead consumers to make more cost-effective choices about their health care. It suggests that decreasing co-pays may be the better policy choice for some types of health care treatments, in order to increase adherence to the appropriate treatment regime. The study considers an approach known as value-based insurance design (VBID), which is a strategy for improving health care quality while controlling health spending. According to the Health Affairs article, “VBID programs are intended to promote the use of services or treatments that provide high benefits relative to cost and, alternatively, to discourage the use of services whose benefits do not justify their cost.”

The new Commonwealth Fund–supported study examined the use of a VBID program at the U.S. technology company Pitney Bowes to make medications of proven value less expensive for their employees. The program eliminated copayments for cholesterol-lowering statins and reduced them for clopidogrel, a blood clot inhibitor.

The study found that adherence to cholesterol-lowering statin drugs, which had been on the decline, immediately stabilized after Pitney Bowes eliminated copays for the drugs for all employees and beneficiaries who had diabetes or vascular disease.  Adherence to statins was 2.8 percent higher in the Pitney Bowes group than in a control group of patients. Similarly, the reduction of copays for clopidogrel led to a 4 percent higher adherence rate than the control group.

The authors conclude that value-based insurance programs can serve as “an alternative to the current trend of rising cost-sharing faced by the majority of commercially insured patients.” The study’s authors acknowledge that the improvements in adherence were “relatively modest,” but they believe those changes could be enhanced through additional policies that address “suboptimal” use of health care services – by, for example, granting copayment waivers only to enrollees who participate in a disease management program.

Jon Peacock

Join us to build a Wisconsin where
every child and family thrives.

Recent

What the Budget Means for Us: A Student’s POV

What the Budget Means for Us: A Student’s POV

By: Eliza Hake and Julia Danes This past semester we had the opportunity to work with Kids Forward, and after these past few months we gained a new perspective on pressing issues globally and in the state of Wisconsin. (Note: statements in this blog may be subject to...

United for Worker Power in Wisconsin

United for Worker Power in Wisconsin

Workers Fight for Fairness in the Capitol Yesterday, more than 20 Wisconsin workers led a new movement into the state capitol, demanding legislators prioritize all families and working people across the state. In collaboration with the Milwaukee Area Service and...

Sign up for Emails

Your address helps us identify your legislators and the most relevant messages to send you.