Supreme Court set to Hear Arguments on Arizona Immigration Law

by | April 24, 2012

Home 9 Family Economic Security 9 Supreme Court set to Hear Arguments on Arizona Immigration Law
The last week of March, the Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the Affordable Care Act. While Americans await the Court’s decision about the ACA, the next contentious issue facing the justices is the fate of Arizona’s now infamous anti-immigration legislation, Arizona SB 1070.  The Immigration Policy Center released a Q and A publication with great information about the case.
On April 25, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments about whether or not SB 1070 is legal in light of conflicting federal laws. One of the central issues is whether states can make and enforce immigration laws – a role that has been held exclusively by the federal government. The main policy of SB 1070 is essentially a concept referred to as “attrition through enforcement” in which aggressive enforcement of immigration laws will make life so difficult for undocumented immigrants that they will “self deport”.
The argument from the justice department has been that SB 1070 does not match federal law and therefore cannot be enforced. Arizona SB 1070 gives Arizona law enforcement the authority to question anyone they have a “reasonable suspicion” is in the United States unlawfully – and enforce federal immigration laws. Arizona argues that police can enforce federal laws – even immigration laws – unless forbidden by Congress from doing so. On the other hand, the United States argues the opposite – that police officers can only enforce immigration laws with the specific permission of Congress as immigration enforcement has historically been a federal responsibility.

Copycat legislation mirroring SB 1070 has sprung up in other states, including Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina, and Utah.  In Wisconsin, Rep. Pridemore authored a bill in the summer of 2011, which has fortunately failed to move forward since.  The fate of these bills that became legislation, and those that have been stalled, will hinge on the decision by the Supreme Court.
More information about the parts of the Arizona law that are being challenged, a list of those who filed amicus briefs both supporting and opposing SB 1070, and an explanation of the possible repercussions of this case can be found in the guide noted above.   See also the op-ed column in the Journal Sentinel by Christine Neumann-Ortiz.                        By Julie Davidson
Kids Forward
Kids Forward

Join us to build a Wisconsin where every child and family thrives.

Recent

Announcing New Deputy Director: Alia Stevenson

Announcing New Deputy Director: Alia Stevenson

The Kids Forward team is excited to announce the hiring of Alia Stevenson as Deputy Director. Stevenson joins the team right as Kids Forward launches Reimagine Wisconsin, an antiracist, community-informed policy agenda focused around four critical pillars for...

10/6: Radical Listening for Youth Justice

10/6: Radical Listening for Youth Justice

Sunday, October 6, 2024, 1-3pmHoney Bee Sage Wellness Apothecary 1819 N Dr Martin Luther King Jr Drive, Milwaukee, WI 53212 Reserve your spot. Free Lunch, Herbal Teas & Alcohol-Free Cocktails PLUS a $25 participation stipend. ***Only 40 spots are available -...

10/17: Improving Language Access in Wisconsin

10/17: Improving Language Access in Wisconsin

[texto en español a continuación] Breaking Barriers Improving Language Access in Wisconsin Thursday, October 17, 1 - 3pmD.J. Bordini Center-Fox Valley Technical College [google map]5 N Systems Dr, Appleton, WI 54914 This event is FREE and open to all healthcare...

Sign up for Emails

Your address helps us identify your legislators and the most relevant messages to send you.