Perhaps the fundamental challenge in juvenile justice research is understanding what steps or actions the system can take that will redirect youthful offenders from a pathway of offending to a pathway of “desistance” – stopping committing offenses. There are multiple complications in researching delinquency, not the least of which is the challenge of following youth over long periods of time. The Research on Pathways to Desistance effort, sponsored by, among others, the MacArthur Foundation’s Models for Change project, attempts to assess youth across a number of variables and then follow them in terms of what the system responses have been, what has been effective, and what seems to make a difference in promoting desistance. The results so far are, not unexpectedly, confounding – that is, the vast majority of youthful offenders do appear to desist, but it’s not totally clear to what extent the system response contributed to that. And, as we are learning in the “what works” type of research, matching the right youth to the right service at the right time is likely to improve, but not guarantee, outcomes. This research is worth following.
The Impact of COVID-19 on Youth Justice in Wisconsin: What Does it Tell Us About the Future of the System?
The COVID-19 pandemic has created an urgent need for safety planning within secure facilities due to a unique set of risks and vulnerabilities for youth who are in custody.1 In comparison to other states, Wisconsin has demonstrated a strong commitment to preserving...